Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights even though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision of your Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking in the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, since the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, rather he has become acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it really is properly-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught because of the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case in the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.

Statutory laws are These created by legislative bodies, for example Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this variety of legislation strives to get more info form our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be extremely hard for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

3.  I have heard the learned counsel with the parties and have long gone through the record of this case with their equipped assistance.

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded as within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They could have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of your grid project and submitted that enough mitigation measures were in place to render any likely adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to be developed.

Electronic and paper court records retained in the court site may be viewed on the courthouse for free, however there is really a rate of ten cents for each page to print from a public access terminal.

after release from the prison he lost interest to contest the moment appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )

Knowledge from the accused is actually a matter to generally be inferred from the circumstances, for it being a state of mind, is very hard for being proved otherwise.”

                                                                  

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to some person, by undertaking an act which from the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently perilous that it must in all likelihood cause death, causes the death of your these kinds of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions from the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it is important that the case proven the application of your precautionary principle where there is a risk to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations of your State in protecting the right to the clean and healthy environment.

competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them being match for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)